Law Is Life Itself and Not the Rules of Its Conduct
an essay by David Elders
From the Spring 1993 Journal of The Fellowship
Much of the rhetoric, the symbols, and the analysis born in this year
of a change in governance, while intended to clarify, instead, cloud our
ability to understand and act upon the differing values and motivations
arising from the inside and outside of our individual and collective lives.
This confusion is sometimes obvious in our national pride. As we congratulate
ourselves for the freedom we believe was born in what we call democracy,
we forget that democracy exists because, in truth, all people are already
free. No system of government produced human beings; in fact, it is the
reverse. Though an immature system of governing may enslave the bodies
of its citizens for a time, it cannot for long enslave the minds, spirits,
or unique personhood contained therein. Eventually, the innate freedom
of minds, spirits, and persons gives birth to a better collective expression
of itself. It is people who give birth to government. It is people who
give birth to democracy.
In the endless debate about the power of liberal or conservative approaches
to improve the lives of our collective citizenry, we tend to forget that
though ideas can affect outer behavior and lead to change, it is ideals
that ultimately lead to our growth to higher levels of civilization. Both
liberal and conservative ideas of governing, while nurtured in the mind,
are born of a single ideal known only in the soul--that the very existence
of each unique person can be no less than an expression of that person's
intrinsic value and any collective activity must both recognize and reflect
that ideal. That is the law of life.
As we beat about the bush of encouraging civilized behavior with this
new idea or that, the law of life itself continues unabated in the inner
experience of each person, apparently unconcerned about the rules we may
establish outside. Notwithstanding who lays claim to power on any given
day, the real meaning and true value of life itself emerges from the inside
out, expressive of a unique convergence of genetics, experience, and the
mysteries of self-conscious existence. While governments pass or rescind
laws governing behavior on the outside, the laws of fear or faith truly
Govern human motivation and action.
The willingness of one person to fuel his or her life by the taking of
another's, is the unmistakable expression of fear; the willingness to
fuel another's life by the giving of one's own, is the unmistakable expression
of faith. If nourished by the recognition that fear causes most human
misery, true government will come to reflect our collective agreement
to provide an exterior environment in which each individual can live a
safer life. Then, as faith begins to fill fear's place in the inner life
of its dwelling, its transformed host, not rules of law, will take us
to higher levels of attainment. There is no other way.
Understanding this principle of the law of life exposes a serious flaw
in our debate about which idea of governing--liberal or conservative--works
best. As the pendulum of politics swings first right then left and back
again, we shift but don't extinguish the fear that truly governs faulty
human actions. Today, those who view themselves as weak, fear that government
won't prevent the strong from abusing them. Tomorrow, another group fears
weakness from the foibles of a fickle electorate and charge their leaders
to protect them for awhile.
The viewers on a swinging pendulum are never truly mindful of the ideal
of the intrinsic value of every human life and busy themselves instead
with the work of justifying their particular solutions. In a misguided
attempt to prove worth and ability, both conservative and liberal alike
raise fears of the other's approach, and so make unintended contribution
to that which fuels the very human responses they seek to modify. Neither
the death penalty nor its lack can still the violent human response to
inner fear; civil rights laws cannot extinguish racial hatred; laws favoring
either abortion or its prevention cannot instill the sense of sacred trust
implicit in the creation of new life. It is inner fear or faith that truly
governs the actions by which our humanity may be stained or glorified.
It is transformed people, not government, who will transform our civilization.
So, while we argue ideas about family life and call them values, life
itself produces family not simply with the birth of a new body, but when
one or two people make the unselfish commitment to care for a child, or
an aged parent, or a sick friend. An army capable of protecting its citizens
is not forged alone by outer conformity to qualifying characteristics,
codes of behavior, or discipline, but in the end by the unselfish commitment
each soldier makes to another fueled by that inner faith in ideals that
overcomes fear. A civilization is not molded by its laws, but its laws
are molded by the civility of its citizens. The true birthplace of civilization
is the inner world of humankind, where dwells the awesome motivating spirit
of conscious life itself. If the evolutionary legacy of animal fear sits
upon the throne of this inner kingdom, our world will witness violence.
If it is faith that rules our inmost being, the world will witness acts
of kindness.
There is a hopeful light. Emerging from the mists of our confusion there
seems a growing consciousness that claims of new ideas to solve the old
ideas' problems are hollow claims indeed. Only by seeking return to the
simple ideal embodied in the unifying commonalty of the very existence
of each and every person will we be able to reach new levels of living.
For it is transformed people, not government, who will transform our civilization.
Thus, we must demand of ourselves and of those we call to service in this
mechanism of our collective, outer lives, that our acts derive from and
reflect the integrity, unselfish dedication, and principle that is rooted
in faith and which engenders trust, not fear, in all the rest of us. Then,
and only then, will we be able to accomplish the challenge which Maya
Angelou placed before us: to look into another person's face, to see her
soul, and make her morning good.
|